Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack: What It Is and How to Secure Against It

Close-up Portrait of Software Engineer Working on Computer, Line of Code Reflecting in Glasses. Developer Working on Innovative e-Commerce Application using Machine Learning, AI Algorithm, Big Data

Man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks have endured for decades as one of the oldest cyber threats. Researchers have long studied preventing threat actors from tampering with or eavesdropping on communications, dating back to the early 1980s. These attacks are a tactic serving a broader malicious strategy like data theft, fraud or sabotage. Attackers intercept communications and manipulate traffic as a means to an end, aiming to spy on groups, redirect efforts or distract attention rather than as an end in itself.

Though encryption helps prevent MitM attacks, successful threat actors often simply pass intercepted traffic to phishing sites designed to appear legitimate or harvest information before passing communications to their intended destination. Interception and manipulation remain difficult to detect. MitM attacks leverage network communications and trust between parties, not exploits or vulnerabilities, to execute. They pose a constant threat requiring vigilance and defense-in-depth.

MitM attack variants continue evolving, employing techniques like SSL stripping, ARP poisoning, DNS spoofing and more to intercept communications and conduct surveillance, fraud, sabotage or data theft. Defense must adapt quickly to threat tactics and technologies.

Adversaries prey on networks, communications and data through these flexible, scalable and stealthy attacks. Organizations must understand MitM risks, deploy layered safeguards and continually refine defenses against new variants to minimize damage.

What Is a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack?

A man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack intercepts communications between two parties to spy on, sabotage or steal from victims. Attackers insert themselves into the middle of legitimate transactions to monitor or manipulate traffic. MitM attacks represent an enduring threat because of their flexibility, low barrier to entry and ability to exploit connectivity and trust. MitM attacks utilize stealthy techniques and malicious aims depending on targets and objectives. For instance, in SSL stripping, attackers establish an HTTPS connection but use unencrypted HTTP for victim communications, sending information in plain text.

In banking, attackers could see a funds transfer, change the recipient account or amount, and steal information or credentials. Threats could compromise software updates to install malware instead of legitimate updates, exploiting lax encryption and mobile security. Tools automate password harvesting and sending malicious traffic after detecting sensitive information or requests.

A Quick Look: Key Concepts of a MitM Attack

Here is a quick look at some major concepts of a MitM Attack.

Interception

MitM attacks intercept communications between two parties to monitor, manipulate or exploit them. Attackers insert themselves into the middle of a legitimate connection to view and alter traffic.

Deception

MitM attacks are based on deception, disguising the compromised connection as legitimate to avoid suspicion. Victims believe they have a trusted, secure connection when communications are actually being intercepted.

Manipulation

Intercepted communications can be manipulated for purposes like rerouting traffic, installing malware, changing financial transaction details, harvesting credentials or corrupting data. Manipulation aims to exploit the connection for malicious gain.

Surveillance

MitM attacks are often used for surveillance and espionage. By intercepting communications, threat actors can monitor conversations, view sensitive information, track account activity and gain insight into targets’ communications, behaviors, relationships, identities and more.

Pivot Point

MitM attacks establish the attacker as a pivot point in communications, with all traffic passing through them before continuing to the intended destination. This central position enables interception, monitoring and manipulation of communications.

Trust Exploitation

MitM attacks work by exploiting the trust and inherent security of networks, connections and protocols. They leverage the fact that most network communications are not encrypted or authenticated to enable surveillance and exploitation. Trust is abused for malicious objectives.

Strategic Threat

Though often discussed as a tactic, MitM represents a strategic risk due to its flexibility, scalability, stealth and ability to exploit core network functions. It poses a constant, hard to mitigate threat and can be leveraged for severe damage depending on goals and targets. Effective defense requires a strategic, ongoing approach.

Delving Deeper: How MitM Attacks Work

MitM attacks intercept communications between trusted parties with an overarching aim of surveillance, manipulation or exploitation – all without detection. Regardless of techniques leveraged, a fundamental workflow enables these compromising cyber strikes.

Sender A transmits sensitive data, account credentials, financial information or other critical communications to intended recipient B, establishing trust in the legitimate connection. Simultaneously, the MitM threat inserts itself unnoticed into the middle of this trusted relationship.

Positioned between sender and recipient, the MitM attacker monitors communications and eliminates safeguards intended to maintain privacy and security. They covertly change details, corrupt information, drop connections altogether or seize account access at will while victims remain unaware of threat presence or activity.

Examples of how MitM threats compromise connections abound but share a common approach: establishing access through deception, maintaining invisibility through control and exploiting trust to enable illegitimate control, surveillance, fraud, sabotage and more against unsuspecting victims. Strategic and continuous innovation is required to match the determined efforts of MitM actors seeking new vectors of exploitation and opportunities to cause harm.

Who Is at Risk of MitM Attacks?

Almost any individual, organization or network can be at risk of MitM attacks due to the following factors:

Lack of Encryption

Networks, connections or communications that lack encryption across any layer of the stack are vulnerable to MitM interception and exploitation. This includes unencrypted Wi-Fi networks, HTTP vs HTTPS, and cleartext protocols. Widespread encryption adoption helps reduce risks but does not eliminate them completely due to other vulnerabilities.

Trust Exploitation

MitM attacks work by abusing the trust that networks, systems and users inherently place in connections and communications. Almost all network interactions start with an assumption of trust, and MitM threats exploit this trust to conduct surveillance, fraud or sabotage. Establishing and validating trust is key to defense but difficult to implement completely.

Complex Hybrid Networks

Modern networks encompass on-premises infrastructure, cloud deployments, virtual networks, mobile devices and more—all with varying security practices, encryption use and trust assumptions between components. The more complex a network, the more potential pivot points, interfaces and protocols that can be exploited for MitM attacks. Consistent, layered security is required to manage risks across heterogeneity.

Usage of Vulnerable Protocols

Protocols like ARP, BGP, DNS and others were developed for interoperability, not security. But they have seen increasing exploitation for MitM threats due to weaknesses in authentication, validation and trust establishment. Until protocols build in stronger security mechanisms, the use of any protocol can put a network at risk of poisoning, hijacking or spoofing attacks enabling MitM.

Types of MitM Attacks

Here are the most common types of MitM attacks:

SSL Stripping

Attackers establish an HTTPS connection with the server but use HTTP for the victim connection. The server presents an SSL certificate, but no encryption is used for the victim’s traffic. Information is sent in plain text, exposing it to interception and manipulation.

Evil Twin

Attackers set up a rogue Wi-Fi network with the same name (SSID) as a legitimate network to confuse victims into connecting to it. Once connected, all traffic is routed through the attacker’s network, enabling interception and manipulation. The genuine network remains operational, masking the attack.

DNS Spoofing

Attackers poisoning a DNS cache or exploiting a spoofing vulnerability to map a domain (e.g. example.com) to their own IP address instead of the legitimate one. All traffic for that domain is then routed to the attacker’s server, allowing them to conduct a MitM attack. Victims remain unaware the domain is compromised.

Routing Protocol Manipulation

For remote attacks, threats can advertise themselves as the most trusted router or gateway for a network to Route traffic through them. They send malicious updates via protocols like BGP to hijack routes and redirect traffic to their server for interception and MitM exploitation.

ARP Poisoning

A local network vulnerability can be exploited by flooding the network with corrupted Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) messages. These messages map IP addresses to Mac addresses, and poisoning them causes traffic intended for one IP to be sent to an attacker’s Mac address instead. This allows interception and MitM at the local network level.

How to Detect MitM Attacks

If not proactively searching for interception signs, MitM detection proves difficult. However, certain activities increase visibility into compromised connections. Close observation of URL addresses, SSL locks and network usage provides insight into threat activity.

URLs beginning with “HTTPS” and an SSL lock icon to the left signify a secure website, whereas “HTTP” alone warns of potential interception. Lacking encryption exposes communications, so encountering unencrypted sites while connected represents an immediate risk.

Public Wi-Fi networks also demand heightened vigilance. Criminals frequently conduct surveillance on public networks to enable MitM exploitation. Never assume public Wi-Fi legitimacy or safety. Only connect to trusted, recognized networks when possible.

Proactive security requires constant monitoring, adaptation and defense innovation to manage evolving MitM threats. While no single step alone prevents exploitation, integrating visibility, vigilance and protection-focused practices establishes the comprehensive risk management needed to minimize threats, damage and discovery time. MitM detection may remain difficult, but with strategic defense, impacts can be contained. Staying aware and disciplined provides the best defense against stealthy cyber threats exploiting real-world trust and technological complexity.

Get the latest from our blog posts

Industrial news, infographics, case studies, guides, and more.

Transcend with Doit Security

Partner. Trust. Scale. Grow.